| Introduction: Sickle  cell hemoglobinopathy is one of the most common monogenic disorders worldwide  with an autosomal recessive inheritance (1). Around 300 million sickle cell  carriers are present worldwide, with a significant concentration in Africa, the  Arab Peninsula, India, the Mediterranean, and the southern United States (2).  The sickle trait is prevalent in numerous tribal communities in India, with a  prevalence ranging from 1-40 % (3), who generally have a high socioeconomic  disadvantage and are medically underserved (4). As per the available  literature, many Indian states like Odisha, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh,  Chhattisgarh have no state-level programs on sickle cell screening and counseling. According  to WHO, 70% of deaths due to HbS are preventable by early diagnosis,  awareness, and treatment of infections (5). However, the sickle cell trait is rarely associated with  symptoms. Hence, counseling and screening programs are most needed to deal with  healthy carriers of these traits.                  The  homozygous form of HbS is associated with very high comorbidities than the  heterozygotes (6). This  poses enormous stress and financial burden on the families (7). In most developing countries,  the healthcare of families having sickle cell hemoglobinopathies is mainly paid  through out-of-pocket expenditure (8).  Thus, studying the financial impact of sickle cell hemoglobinopathies on  households will assist policymakers and health care professionals in developing  ways to reduce the burden and identify cost-effective measures in caring for  persons with this condition. (9).                  Koraput district of Odisha state, where the present study was  conducted, is one of the underdeveloped districts and predominantly inhabited  by tribal and scheduled caste people, who have a high dominance of  socioeconomic disadvantage and are often medically deprived. No studies reported  the health care cost of families with sickle cell hemoglobinopathies in this  district, and also a very few old studies reported  the prevalence of sickle cell carriers in minimal regions. Therefore, the present study aims to determine  the prevalence and distribution of sickle cell hemoglobin as well as the  economic burden on households in Koraput district of Odisha. Also, the study tries  to address the hesitance and stigma towards HbS screening, especially among  girls with HbS.  Materials  and Methods   A cross-sectional  study for sickle cell carrier screening was  conducted in Koraput district of Odisha. Initially, a pilot study was carried  out in 2 villages, and then the snowball sampling technique was used with the  help of villagers, Anganwadi and health workers to locate other villages with a  high number of sickle cell carriers. A total of 22 villages, which were  remotely situated and where healthcare facilities were not easily accessible,  were selected for the present study.  Altogether  1092 individuals of either sex, aged above 30 years, were randomly screened  from the selected villages (n=22) to assess the prevalence of the sickle cell  carrier. After the screening, those  found sickling positive, their family members (n=54) were traced and screened  to know their HbS status. Blood samples from each  individual were collected and tested on the spot to determine the  prevalence of sickle cell hemoglobin.   The  blood samples were tested by the sodium metabisulphite (Na2S2O5)  technique described by Daland and Castle for determining the presence of  sickling red cells (10). This method ensures a complete reduction of hemoglobin  even in the presence of fetal hemoglobin (11). A 2% Na2S2O5 solution was  prepared in sterile distilled water shortly before the tests were started,  which were completed in about three hours. One drop of fresh blood was  collected on the center of a microscope slide by finger prick with a lancet,  and it was immediately mixed with a drop of the metabisulphite solution. The  mixture was covered with a coverslip and sealed the edge with nail polish  instantly. After incubation for around 30 minutes at room temperature, the  slides were studied under a field microscope. The positive cases showed the  characteristic sickle shapes of the red cells.   Furthermore, demographic information along with  family (n=552) expenditure on healthcare was recorded. Statistical  analysis was performed using SPSS (version 22). The  study was approved by the Ethical Committee, Department of Anthropology,  University of Delhi. During data collection, informed written consent,  transcribed in local languages, was obtained from each participant before  recruitment. Results   A  total of 1092 individuals were screened for sickle cell trait in Koraput  district of Odisha. Of the total samples screened, 508 were males (46.52%) and 584 were females (53.48%). The mean age (SD) of  the subjects was 37.5±7.4. 49.5% of the respondents were literate, and the mean  educational level was 3.7. Out of 1092 individuals, 103 (9.43%) individuals  were found to be sickle cell carriers. Moreover, in the present study, the  prevalence of sickle cell trait was found more in females (10.79%) than males (7.87%). Also, the study found  a significantly higher prevalence of sickle cell hemoglobins among SCs (9.98%)  than STs (3.33%) (Table-1). 
  
    | Table    1: Prevalence of sickle cell hemoglobin (HbS) in Koraput district of Odisha |  
    |   | No. Screened | HbS cases | p-value |  
    | No. | % |  
    | Total | 1092 | 103 | 9.43 |  
    | Male | 508 | 40 | 7.87 | 0.134 |  
    | Female | 584 | 63 | 10.79 |  
    | Scheduled    castes (SC) | 1002 | 100 | 9.98 | 0.05 |  
    | Scheduled    tribes (ST) | 90 | 3 | 3.33 |     
  
    |  |  
    | Figure  1: Age-wise  distribution of HbA and HbS individuals (in %) (p<0.05) |  There  found a tendency for the sickling rate to be higher in lower age groups among  studied subjects. The highest prevalence (9.96%) was observed among individuals  in the 35-39 years age group, whereas the lowest prevalence (7.46%) was in  55-59 years. (Figure-1).  46% of the  sickle cell carriers’ parents had a consanguineal marriage.   Table 2 depicts the comparative demographic  information of HbA and HbS individuals. A higher number of unmarried and  divorced/separated individuals were found among sickle cell carriers (almost  7%). The average annual expenditure on healthcare was found significantly higher  in the families having sickle cell hemoglobinopathies, i.e., 3% to almost 65%  of the family income. In contrast, the healthcare expenditure was 0.78% to  18.4% in families without sickle cell hemoglobin (p<0.05). The families with  only sickle cell carriers had lower spending than in families with sickle cell  disease. About 14.3% of the households having HbS had more than 30% healthcare  cost, whereas only about 0.6% of the households without HbS had more than 30% healthcare cost (Table 3). 
  
    | Table 2: Demographic information of HbA and    HbS individuals  |  
    | Characteristics  | HbA individuals (n=1015) | HbS individuals (n=131) | p-value  |  
    | Gender  |  
    | Male  | 478    (47.09%) | 55 (41.98%) | 0.26  |  
    | Female | 537    (52.91%) | 76 (58.02%) |  
    | Age  |  
    | Mean age ±SD | 36.42±7.5 | 37.5±7.4 |   |  
    | Community |  
    | SC | 922 (90.80%) | 125 (95.42%) | 0.07 |  
    | ST | 93 (9.16%) | 6 (4.58%) |  
    | Marital status |  
    | Married | 1013 (99.8%) | 124 (94.66%) | <0.001 |  
    | Single  | 2 (0.2) (males) | 8 (6.11%) (5 females & 3 males) |  
    | Divorced/ separated | 0 | 2 (1.53%) |  
    | Education |  
    | Literate  | 476 (46.9%) | 60 (45.8%) | 0.81 |  
    | Non-literate | 539 (53.1%) | 71 (54.2%) |  
    | Educational level (mean±SD) | 4.67± 4.32  | 3.7± 3.8 |   |  
    | Family income and healthcare expenditure |  
    | Annual family Income (mean±SD) | 65906 ±13634.11  | 67107±13067.2 |   |  
    | Annual healthcare expenditure (mean±SD) | 2007.18±1164 | 5473.5±1823 |   |    
  
    | Table 3: Healthcare cost of families with HbA and HbS |  
    | Healthcare expenditure (% of the annual    family income) | No. of households without HbS (n=482) | No. of households with HbS (n=70) | p-value |  
    | No. | % | No. | % | <0.05 |  
    | <10%  | 347 | 71.99 | 29 | 41.43 |  
    | 10% to <20% | 120 | 24.90 | 20 | 28.57 |  
    | 20% to <30% | 12 | 2.49 | 11 | 15.71 |  
    | >30% | 3 | 0.62 | 10 | 14.29 |  Discussion   The  objective of screening for sickle cell hemoglobin is to deliver timely care to  reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with the disorder. Also, it will  help to avoid further inheritance of this disorder to the next generations.   The  study found a prevalence of 9.43% of sickle cell traits in Koraput district of  Odisha. Similar other studies also reported an almost identical prevalence of  sickle cell hemoglobin (12-14). Based on the  latest ICMR survey, sickle cell carriers range up to 40% among different  groups of India (3). However, no published literature was found that reported  the prevalence of sickle cell alleles from the past five decades in the studied  area. The prevalence of sickle cell hemoglobinopathy was found to be higher in  females than males in the studied population.   The  HbS was first reported in a tribal community in southern India (15), leading to  the belief that it is limited to tribal communities. Also, several studies  stated that sickle cell carriers are more prevalent among the tribal  populations (1-35%) (16, 3, 14). However, the present study found the HbS more  prevalent in scheduled castes (STs) (9.98%) than in tribal groups (3.33%). This  finding corroborates previous studies (12, 17-20).   The  present study observed a tendency for the sickling rate to be higher in lower  age groups (aged from 59 to 35 years) among studied subjects. The highest  prevalence (9.96%) was found among the individuals in the 35-39 years age group,  whereas the lowest prevalence (7.46%) was in 55-59 years. This corroborates an  earlier study that reported a high prevalence of sickle cell carriers in  younger people (21). This difference may be because of the increasing mortality  rate with age or the higher number of live births with SCT. The associated  comorbidities also rise among sickle cell carriers with aging, which may be the  reason behind high mortality among elderly people resulting in a low prevalence  of the HbS.   The present study found that about 46% of the  sickle cell carriers’ parents had a consanguineal marriage, resulting in the  inheritance of the sickle cell trait. An earlier study also described that the  prevalence of sickle cell hemoglobinopathies increases in Koraput district  because of the consanguineal marriage practice (4). Moreover, a similar study  reported a high incidence of sickle cell traits in the Indian subcontinent due  to the practice of consanguineal marriage (22). So there exists a lack of awareness and knowledge  among them. As the literacy rate among the respondents was relatively lower (46.35%), more awareness requires  concerning the inheritance pattern of the sickle cell trait, potential  pregnancy issues, HbS screening and counseling. The sickle cell  hemoglobin is prevalent in malaria-endemic regions where Plasmodium falciparum  was prevalent. Koraput is falls under malaria endemic area (23,24).  Therefore, the present study could support  the ‘malaria hypothesis’ as the studied area falls under a malaria-endemic zone.    In the studied area, unmarried  girls were unwilling to participate in HbS screening. When the reason for this  was asked them personally, they described that if they tested positive for the sickle  cell hemoglobinopathies, then nobody would marry them. This may be the cause in  the present study that more than 6% of the individuals with the HbS were  unmarried even after 30 years old, where the mean age at marriage was almost 21  years, similar to the census 2011 (25).  Consequently, community-based awareness  programs should be initiated to tackle the issues.   The percentage of household income spent as  healthcare overheads ranged from 3% to 64.4% in families with sickle cell  hemoglobinopathies. In comparison, the expenditure on health in families  without sickle cell hemoglobinopathies was 0.78% to 18.4% of their family  income. Earlier studies also found a high expenditure rate in families having  sickle cell patients (9, 6). However, this proportion affected more in the  studied area as they have a comparatively lower family income. The high  difference in healthcare costs among families with sickle cell carriers was  found because families with only sickle cell carriers had a lower expenditure  than families with sickle cell disease. Although recently the government of  Odisha has implemented a scheme for providing 500 rupees to each individual  with sickle cell disease, it is negligible compared with their healthcare cost.  Also, the literacy rate (46.35%) was found to be lower in the studied population  as compared to the national (74.04% ) and state (72.9%) level literacy rate (25).  It is challenging to manage this disorder and associated issues for people with  significantly low literacy and economic status. Therefore, it is high time to  implement screening, counseling, and awareness programs in the studied area. Declarations Funding: 
  The authors acknowledge the grants received  from the Institution of Eminence, University of Delhi (IoE/FRP/PCMS/2020/27). Ethics  approval:   The  work was approved by the Ethical Committee, Department of Anthropology,  University of Delhi. Consent  to participate:   Informed  consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.  Consent  for publication:   All  authors agreed with the content and that all gave explicit consent to submit. Conflict  of interest: 
  The  authors declare no competing interests. References  
  Serjeant  GR, Serjeant BE, editors. Sickle cell disease, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ  Press; 2001.Key NS, Connes P, Derebail VK. Negative health  implications of sickle cell trait in high income countries: from the football  field to the laboratory. British Journal of Haematology.  2015; 170(1): 5-14.Colah RB, Mukherjee MB, Martin S, Ghosh K.  Sickle cell disease in tribal populations in India. The Indian Journal  of Medical Research. 2015; 141(5): 509. Bindhani BK, Devi NK, Nayak JK. Knowledge,  awareness, and attitude of premarital screening with special focus on sickle  cell disease: a study from Odisha. Journal of Community Genetics.  2020; 11(4): 445-449.Williams TN, Obaro SK. Sickle cell disease and  malaria morbidity: a tale with two tails. Trends in Parasitology.  2011; 27(7): 315-320.Ngolet LO, Engoba MM, Kocko I, Dokekias AE, Mombouli JV, Moyen GM. Sickle-cell disease healthcare cost in  Africa: Experience of the Congo. Anemia. 2016.Brown BJ, Okereke JO, Lagunju IA, Orimadegun  AE, Ohaeri JU, Akinyinka. Burden of healthcare of carers of children with  sickle cell disease in Nigeria. Health & Social Care in the  Community  2010; 18(3): 289-295.Xu K, Evans DB, Kawabata K, Zeramdini R, Klavus  J, Murray CJ. Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry  analysis. The Lancet. 2003; 362(9378): 111-117.Olatunya OS, Ogundare EO, Fadare JO, Oluwayemi  IO, Agaja OT, Adeyefa BS, Aderiye O. The financial burden of sickle cell  disease on households in Ekiti, Southwest Nigeria. Clinico Economics and  Outcomes Research: CEOR. 2015; 7:545–553.Daland GA, Castle WB. A simple and rapid method  for demonstrating sickling of the red blood cells: the use of reducing  agents. The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. 1948;  33(9): 1082-1088.Allison AC. Notes on sickle-cell polymokphism:  with statistical appendix, by Sheila Maynard Smith. Annals of Human  Genetics. 1954; 19(1): 39-51.Colah R, Mukherjee M, Ghosh K. Sickle cell  disease in India. Current Opinion in Hematology. 2014; 21(3):  215-223. Patel J, Patel B, Gamit N, Serjeant GR.  Screening for the sickle cell gene in Gujarat, India: a village-based  model. Journal of Community Genetics. 2013; 4(1): 43-47. Patra PK, Chauhan VS, Khodiar PK, Dalla AR,  Serjeant GR. Screening for the sickle cell gene in Chhattisgarh state, India:  an approach to a major public health problem. Journal of Community  Genetics. 2011; 2(3): 147-151. Lehmann H, Cutbush M. Sickle-cell trait in  southern India. British Medical Journal. 1952; 1(4755): 404. Bindhani BK, Nayak JK. Quality of life among  individuals with sickle cell disease: A study from Koraput district, Odisha. International  Journal of Academic Research and Development. 2018; 3(2): 726-730.Charuhas AV, Neelam SD, Sanjay KS, Sanjay AB,  Mohan KB, Sanjeev CM, Manjusha DA. Do gender differences influence the  prevalence of sickle cell disorder and related morbidities among school  children in rural central India?. International Journal of  Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine & Public Health. 2013;  5(5): 348. Mohanty D, Das K. Genetic counselling in  tribals in India. The Indian Journal of Medical Research.  2011; 134(4): 561.Piel FB, Patil AP, Howes RE, Nyangiri OA,  Gething PW, Williams TN, Weatherall DJ, Hay SI. Global distribution of the  sickle cell gene and geographical confirmation of the malaria hypothesis. Nature  Communications. 2010; 1(1): 1-7.Saha  N, Banerjee B. Incidence of abnormal hemoglobins in different ethnic groups of  India. Hum Genetik. 1971; 11(4):300-3.Kar BC, Devi S, Dash KC, Das M. The sickle cell  gene is widespread in India. Transactions of the Royal Society of  Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1987; 81(2): 273-275. Mukherjee  BN, Das MK. Spatial distribution of two predominant abnormal haemoglobins – HbE  and HbS in Indian subcontinent. J. Indian Anthrop. Soc. 1990; 25: 39-59.Rajagopalan PK, Pani SP, Das PK, Jambulingam P.  Malaria in Koraput district of Orissa. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics.  1989; 56(3): 355-364. Das LK, Padhi B, Sahu SS. Prediction of outcome  of severe falciparum malaria in Koraput, Odisha, India: A hospital-based  study. Tropical Parasitology. 2014; 4(2): 105–110.District Census Handbook, Koraput. Census  of India-2011. https://censusindia.gov. in/2011census/dchb/2129_PART_B_DCHB_KORAPUT.pdf.  Accessed September 11th, 2021.  |