| 
          
            | OJHAS Vol. 10, Issue 2: 
            (Apr-Jun 2011) |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
            | Specialty 
Preference Among Medical Students and Factors Affecting It |  
            |  |  
            | 
              
                | Neeraj Gour, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Community Medicine, 
        College of Medicine & JNM Hospitals, Kalyani (West Bengal), Dhiraj Srivastava, Lecturer, Department of Community Medicine, RIMS & R, Safai (Uttar Pradesh),
 Paharam Adhikari, Postgraduate Resident, Dept. of Community Medicine, GRMC, Gwalior, (Madhya Pradesh),
 Anumita Shahi, Dentist, Gwalior, (Madhya Pradesh),
 Sharma MK, Prof & Head, 
Dept. of Community Medicine, College of Medicine & JNM Hospitals, Kalyani, (West Bengal),
 Mahajan PC, Prof & Head, Dept. of Community Medicine, GRMC, Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh).
 |  |  |  
                |  |  |  
                | Dr. Neeraj Gour,
          
            |  |  |  |  
            |  |  | Address for Correspondence | R-14, Rishi Nagar,
 Hem Singh ki Pared,
 Lashkar, Gwalior,
 Madhya Pradesh - 474001, India
 E-mail:  
            
                drneeraj_g04@yahoo.com
 |  |  |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
            | 
            Gour N, Srivastava D, Adhikari P, Shahi A, Sharma MK, Mahajan PC. Specialty 
Preference Among Medical Students and Factors Affecting It. Online J Health Allied Scs. 
            2011;10(2):12 |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
            | Submitted: June 23, 
            2011; Accepted: Jul 16, 2011; Published: Jul 30, 2011 |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
          
          
            | Abstract: |  
            | Introduction: Medical education 
is one of the core part of educational system of any country. Medical 
education requires undergraduate students to study a wide range of medical 
specialties. It is often assumed that students do not make their career 
preferences until after they have graduated from medical school. So 
the reasons and factors responsible for preferences need to be found 
out among medical students. Material 
and Methods: It was a Cross 
sectional study on 180 medical students to assess preference for specialty 
and factors responsible. Results: Out of total 
190 medical students more or less everyone (97.89%) wanted to pursue 
specialization and majority of them (96.84%) wanted to pursue the same 
in Medical Field (p>0.05). majority of male students were interested 
to pursue their specialization in the field of medicine (37.63%), surgery 
(23.65%) and pediatrics (13.97%). On the other hand female students 
were more interested in medicine (24.17%), pediatrics (32.96%) and obstetrics 
& gynecology (24.17%)(p<0.05). Interest, by far was found to be most 
common factor (76.63%) responsible for the preference of particular 
medical specialty among all four groups of students (1st 
professional-25.27%, 2nd professional-75.92%, final professional-89.47%, interns-68.42%). Conclusion: It is thus 
concluded there are many factors playing role in the specialty selection 
and preference among the medical students and should be equally justified 
and addressed.Key Words: 
 Medical students; 
Specialty preference
 |  
            |  |  Medical education 
is one of the core part of educational system of any country. Medical 
education requires undergraduate students to study a wide range of medical 
specialties. It is often assumed that students do not make their career 
preferences until after they have graduated from medical school. However, 
not only medical school entrants1, but even medical school 
applicants, often have strong preferences for or against some medical 
careers.2-4 They love to choose clinical specialty rather 
than a preclinical and paraclinical specialty like Anatomy, Community medicine, 
          Pathology etc. Our country 
has been suffering with dearth of doctors since long. Though Govt. has 
made lot of efforts to fill this gap but still situation is not satisfactory. 
Still more needs to be done by Govt. more and more medical colleges 
are being open up in the country to cope up with this problem. But for 
the smooth conduction of any medical college we need the good faculty 
so as to train immaculately budding doctors. But our country’s medical 
colleges are facing this grave situation of faculty deficiency, especially 
in the Dept. of preclinical and paraclinical specialties and reasons 
are many among them e.g. interest and preference for specialty among 
the undergraduate students. Some studies 
have well suggested that majority of medical students want to pursue 
their specialization in clinical branches and very few of them are interested 
in pre and paraclinical branches.5 And this thinking of 
students is creating this menace of disparity for faculty members in 
medical colleges. Lots of posts are still vacant in these streams despite 
stern efforts to fill them. This somehow is diluting our medical educational 
system. So the reasons 
and factors responsible need to be found out among medical students. 
So that corrective measures can be choked out at earliest. Same was 
planned by conduction of this study though at small scale, among undergraduate 
medical students of GR Medical College with the objectives: 
            To find out 
            preference order for different medical specialties among medical 
            students.To find out 
            different factors responsible for the selection of particular 
            specialty. Study design: 
Observational Cross sectional study. Study 
duration: December 2010 to February 2011. Study 
sample: 180 undergraduate medical students of G.R. Medical College, 
Gwalior. Sampling 
technique: Stratified random sampling was used for the collection 
of sample. Sample selection: 
For the selection of sample four different lists were prepared of undergraduate 
medical students with the help of college record. Each list was having 
140 medical students a total of 700 medical students. Out of these 72 
students from 1st professional, 110 from 2nd professional, 121 
from final professional (part 1&2) and 82 from intern batch have given 
their verbal consent to participate in the study. By using random number 
35 students from 1st professional, 54 students from 2nd 
professional, 60 students from final professional and 41 students from intern batch 
were selected for the study. Ethical 
consideration: There was no intervention tried in the study; however, 
verbal consent was sought from each and every participant of study. Data collection: Data was collected 
with the use of pretested semi structured Performa. This was including 
questionnairs regarding sociodemographic profile, preference for the 
specialty, factors responsible for the selection of particular branch.  
Data was collected with the help of medical students and other staff 
members of Department. Data processing 
and analysis: Data was collected 
and put in to spread sheet of MS Excel. Later on it was analyzed manually 
and with the use of suitable statistical software. Statistical test 
which was used for the analysis of data was chi square test at 95 % 
confidence level. P-value was taken as significant when found less than 
0.05. 
          In the present 
study out of total 190 medical students 97(51.05 %) were male and 93 
(48.94%) were female. Majority of medical students (48.95%) were belonging 
to age group of 20 to 23 yrs followed by 17 to 20 and above 23 yrs (31.05% 
& 20 %).Around half of medical students (46.84%) were having any 
or both of their parents as a Doctor by profession ( p>0.05). Study 
also tried to find out the level of Advise given to medical students 
by anyone and it was found that a total of 183 (96.31%) medical students 
have got advice from anyone in any form (p>0.05). (Table - 1) 
| Table 1: Distribution of 
Participants on the Basis of Socio Demography, Parent Employment & 
Advise given to Students.  |  |  | 1st 
  Professional. (N=35) n (%) | 2nd 
  Professional. (N=54) n (%) | Final Professional. (N=60) n (%) | Internship (N=41) n (%) | Total (N= 190) n (%) | Chi-Sq. (X2) 
  & P value |  | Sex 
  wise |  | Male | 18 (51.4) | 24 (44.44) | 34 (56.66) | 21 (51.21) | 97 (51.05) | X2 
  -1.70 P-0.636 |  | Female | 17 (48.57) | 30 (55.55) | 26(43.33) | 20 (48.78) | 93 (48.94) |  | Age 
  wise |  | 17-20 
  yrs | 23 (65.71) | 35 (64.81) | 01 (1.66) | 00 (0.00) | 59 (31.05) | X2 
  -142.86 P-0.000001* |  | 20-23 
  yrs | 11(31.42) | 17(31.48) | 51 (85.00) | 14(34.15) | 93(48.95) |  | Above 
  23 yrs | 01(2.85) | 02 (3.70) | 08 (13.33) | 27 (65.85) | 38(20.00) |  | Any 
  or Both of Parent Doctor |  | Yes | 12 (34.28) | 33(61.11) | 26(43.33) | 18(43.90) | 89(46.84) | X2-7.07 P-0.0696 |  | No | 23(65.71) | 21(38.88) | 34(56.66) | 23(56.09) | 101(53.15) |  | Given 
  Advise by anyone |  | Yes | 33(94.28) | 53(98.14) | 59(98.33) | 38(92.68) | 183(96.31) | X2-3.13 P-0.371 |  | No | 02(5.71) | 01(1.85) | 01(1.66) | 03(7.31) | 07(3.68) |  | * Statistically significant. |  Out of total 
190 medical students more or less everyone (97.89%) wanted to pursue 
specialization and majority of them (96.84%) wanted to pursue the same 
in Medical Field (p>0.05). On contrary very few of them (1.05%) have 
shown their desire to pursue specialization in non medical field. More 
or less same was found when they were asked what they actually want 
to pursue in medical specialization degree or diploma. A total of 181(95.26%) 
students said they only want to pursue degree instead of diploma (p>0.05). 
Very few were seemed interested in diploma. (Table-2) 
|  Table 2:  Distribution of Participants on the Basis of Selection 
of Specialty |  |  | 1st 
  Professional. (N=35) n (%) | 2nd 
  Professional. (N=54) n (%) | Final Professional. (N=60) n (%) | Internship (N=41) n (%) | Total (N= 190) n (%) | Chi-Sq. (X2) 
  & P value |  | Want 
  to pursue specialization? |  | Yes | 35(100) | 54(100) | 58(96.66) | 39(95.12) | 186(97.89) | X2-3.88 P-0.274 |  | No | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 2(3.33) | 2(48.78) | 04(2.10) |  | Which 
  Field? |  | Medical | 35(100) | 54(100) | 57(95.00) | 38(92.68) | 184(96.84) | X2-2.01 P-0.570 |  | Non Medical | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 1(1.66) | 1(2.43) | 2(1.05) |  | Degree 
  or Diploma? |  | Degree | 35(100) | 53(98.14) | 56(93.33) | 37(90.24) | 181(95.26) | X2-0.84 P-0.839 |  | Diploma | 0(0.00) | 1(1.85) | 1(1.66) | 1(2.43) | 03(1.57) |  As far as preference 
of medical specialty among medical students is concerned it was found 
that majority of male students were interested to pursue their specialization 
in the field of Medicine (37.63%), Surgery (23.65%) and Pediatrics (13.97%). 
On the other hand female students were more interested in Medicine (24.17%), 
Pediatrics (32.96%) and Obstetrics & Gynecology (24.17%).(p<0.05) Very few 
students (both male and female) have shown their interest in other clinical, 
paraclinical and preclinical branches. (Table-3) 
| Table 3:  Gender Wise 
Distribution of Participants on the Basis of Preference of Medical Specialty  |  | Medical 
  Specialty | Male  (N=93) n (%) | Female (N=91) n (%) | Total (N=184) n (%) | P value of Chi-Sq. (X2) |  | Medicine | 35(37.63) | 22(24.17) | 57(30.97) | 0.0483* |  | Pediatrics | 13(13.97) | 30(32.96) | 43(23.36) | 0.0023* |  | Surgery | 22(23.65) | 4(4.39) | 26(14.13) | 0.00017* |  | Obs & 
  Gyne | 0(0.00) | 22(24.17) | 22(11.95) | 0.000001* |  | Radiology | 7(7.52) | 4(4.39) | 11(5.97) | 0.370 |  | Ophthalmology | 3(3.22) | 1(1.09) | 4(2.17) | 0.321 |  | Orthopedics | 6(6.45) | 0(0.00) | 6(3.26) | 0.0137* |  | Psychiatry | 4(4.3) | 1(1.09) | 5(2.71) | 0.180 |  | Dermatology | 0(0.00) | 3(3.29) | 3(1.63) | 0.077 |  | Microbiology | 1(1.07) | 2(2.19) | 3(1.63) | 0.547 |  | ENT | 0(0.00) | 1(1.09) | 1(0.54) | 0.312 |  | PSM/Community 
  Medicine | 1(1.07) | 0(0.00) | 1(0.54) | 0.322 |  | Others 
  (Anatomy, Pathology, Physiology etc) | 02(2.15) | 01(1.09) | 3(1.63) | 0.569 |  | * Statistically significant |  Interest, by 
far was found to be most common factor (76.63%) responsible for the 
preference of particular medical specialty among all four groups of 
students ( 1st professional-25.27%, 2nd professional-75.92%, 
final professional-89.47%, interns-68.42%). Some other substantial factors 
were also found to be responsible apart from interest like more income 
(45.10%), specialty reputation (30.43%), more scope (30.43%) etc.
(Table-4)
 
| Table 4: 
  Professional wise Distribution 
of Participants on the basis of factor Responsible for Selection of 
particular Medical Specialty |  | Factor 
  Responsible** | 1st 
  Professional (N=35) n (%) | 2nd 
  Professional. (N=54) n (%) | Final 
  Professional  (N=57) n (%) | Internship (N=38) n (%) | Total (N=184) n (%) | P value of Chi-Sq. (X2) |  | More income | 15(42.85) | 32(59.25) | 19(33.33) | 17(44.73) | 83(45.10) | 0.0543 |  | Job security | 9(25.71) | 22(40.74) | 14(24.56) | 3(7.89) | 48(26.08) | 0.0055* |  | Early 
  settlement | 3(8.57) | 9(16.66) | 6(10.52) | 6(15.78) | 24(13.04) | 0.612 |  | Interest | 23(25.27) | 41(75.92) | 51(89.47) | 26(68.42) | 141(76.63) | 0.000001* |  | Less investment | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 4(7.01) | 8(21.05) | 12(6.52) | 0.00022* |  | Specialty 
  reputation | 9(25.71) | 19(35.18) | 16(28.07) | 12(31.57) | 56(30.43) | 0.772 |  | Less competition | 0(0.00) | 3(5.55) | 0(0.00) | 4(10.52) | 7(3.80) | 0.0352* |  | Less hours 
  of practice | 1(2.85) | 0(0.00) | 6(10.52) | 5(13.15) | 12(6.52) | 0.0323* |  | For teaching 
  as hobby | 0(0.00) | 2(3.70) | 3(5.26) | 1(2.63) | 6(3.26) | 0.575 |  | Afraid 
  of operative procedures/blood | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 4(7.01) | 2(5.26) | 6(3.26) | 0.110 |  | More scope | 10(28.57) | 17(31.48) | 16(28.07) | 13(34.21) | 56(30.43) | 0.920 |  | Preference 
  of terminal branch | 4(11.42) | 7(12.96) | 8(14.03) | 5(13.15) | 24(13.04) | 0.987 |  | Relationship 
  with patients | 3(8.57) | 5(9.25) | 2(3.50) | 3(7.89) | 13(7.06) | 0.646 |  | Intellectual 
  content of specialty | 2(5.71) | 5(9.25) | 5(8.77) | 3(7.89) | 15(8.15) | 0.940 |  | No on 
  call/emergency schedule | 4(11.42) | 6(11.11) | 7(12.28) | 3(7.89) | 20(10.86) | 0.923 |  | Influenced 
  by friends | 0(0.00) | 8(14.81) | 1(1.75) | 0(0.00) | 9(4.89) | 0.00141* |  | Advice 
  from teachers | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 3(5.26) | 0(0.00) | 3(1.63) | 0.0788 |  | Family 
  pressure | 0(0.00) | 4(7.40) | 2(3.50) | 0(0.00) | 6(3.26) | 0.144 |  | Family 
  background | 1(2.85) | 5(9.25) | 5(8.77) | 3(7.89) | 14(7.60) | 0.694 |  | Others | 3(8.57) | 0(0.00) | 3(5.26) | 2(5.26) | 8(4.34) | 0.246 |  | * Statistically significant; **Multiple response questions. |  The career 
preferences made by medical students and doctors and factors influencing 
these preferences are of importance to medical workforce planners especially 
in times of oversupply or undersupply of doctors.5 Present study 
has revealed that majority of medical students (97.98%) right from first 
professional to internship students wants to pursue specialization especially 
in medical field where as very few of them were interested in non medical 
field specialization. This may be attributed to students want to nurture 
their under graduation in post graduation so that they can make their 
hard work productive and fruitful which they did during their under 
graduation. Medical students, especially undergraduates, place great 
emphasis on specialization for several reasons including better career 
opportunities, the perception that MBBS doctors have less status in 
society and the belief that an MBBS degree does not sufficiently qualify 
them to practice medicine. This drives most undergraduates to pursue 
a postgraduate degree.6 Meager interest in non medical branch specialization 
may be attributed to fear among students for their wastage of hard work 
during under graduation by doing so. But one very good example of nonmedical 
specialty is Hospital administration and we always need some very good 
hospital administrators cum doctors for our hospitals. Of total students, 95.26%  said that they would like to pursue only degree course 
instead of diploma. This may be attributed to early settlement, more 
pride and progress in degree courses as diploma candidate cant apply 
for the faculty positions in medical colleges and if they want so then 
they have to first pursue DNB in same specialty then they may become 
eligible as per the notification of Union Health Ministry of India  
that DNB holders can also be allowed to teach in medical   
colleges.7 But this trend among medical students 
can produce a vacuum diploma holders who are also the important part 
of health system of country; moreover everyone can’t get degree every 
time in their specialty of interest. Medicine (37.63%), Pediatrics (13.97%) 
and Surgery (23.65%) were most favorite branches among males where as 
Medicine (24.17%), Pediatrics (32.96%) and Obs. & Gyne. (24.17%) 
were among females. Yousef K et al have also found the same things 
in their study. They found most preferred specialty expressed by male 
students was surgery, followed by Internal Medicine and Orthopaedics, 
while the specialty most preferred by female students was Obstetrics 
and Gynaecology, followed by pediatrics and surgery.5 
Same was also notices in some other studies.8-12 
This may be because of interest in specialty (76.63%), more income generation 
(45.10%), specialty reputation (30.43%), job security (26.08%) etc among 
both male and female students. Yousef K et al found 84% of medical 
students rated "intellectual content of the specialty", 64% 
rated "individual's competencies” as influential on their preference 
of specialty. Other important factors rated as 
influential were "reputation of the specialty" (59%), "anticipated 
income"(58%) and "focus on urgent care" (55%).5 
These findings were different from our study. Further longitudinal research 
is needed to explore it more. Apart from hike in number of postgraduate seats 
in medical colleges these above found factors should also be looked 
in to. Many 
aspects of class and family background shape a child’s education. Fathers 
with high-status occupations also provide substantial educational advantages.13 Interestingly though around half of students (46.84%) 
have both or any parent as doctor but very few of them (7.6%) have sat 
their preference of specialty because of this reason. More or less same 
was noticed in level of advice as 96.31% of total students have got 
advice in any form but very few of them (1.63%)  considered it 
as a major factor for specialty selection. This questions the quality 
of advise provided and demands proper carrier counseling of medical 
students during their under graduation. Undergraduate students often 
don’t have deep knowledge of any subject so they just take their decision 
without thinking substantially on the basis of few factors. Several 
studies have cited clinical role models as being important influences 
on students' residency preferences.14-18 This included 
negative role models, who drove students away from some specialties.17 In addition to faculty, resident role models have been occasionally 
cited as influential.15,16 
For the 
MBBS course alone, over 2000 teachers are required for Community Medicine, 
General Medicine and General Surgery, 1600–2000 for Anatomy, Physiology, 
Pathology and Anaesthesiology and 1000–1500 for Pharmacology, Paediatrics, 
Orthopaedics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Radiodiagnosis.19 
This shows that our country is being suffered by dearth of doctors especially 
in some notifiable branches like Preclinical branches like Anatomy, 
Physiology, Biochemistry paraclinical & clinical branches like Pathology, 
Pharmacology, Forensic medicine, Community Medicine, Psychiatry etc. 
this situation is also diluting  quality of medical education in 
our medical colleges. So some immediate steps need to be worked out 
to solve this cropping problem. Small scale, 
uni centric study was some of the limitations of this study. More research 
is demanded on this topic as a multi centric survey on large sample 
to come out findings with more precision and externally validated. It is thus 
concluded there are many factors playing role in the specialty selection 
and preference among the medical students. These all substantial factors 
should be equally justified and addressed for all specialties of medical 
science so that this quantitative and qualitative inequality of doctors 
and specialists can be nullified. 
    Wright B, 
Scott I, Woloschuk W, Brenneis F, Bradley J. Career choice of new medical 
students at three Canadian universities: family medicine versus specialty 
medicine. CMAJ 2004;170:1920-1924.
    
McManus 
IC, Lefford F, Furnham AF, Shahidi S, Pincus T. Career preference and 
personality differences in medical school applicants. Psychology, Health 
and Medicine 1996;1:235-248.
Hutt R, 
Parsons D, Pearson R. The timing of and reasons for doctors' career decisions. 
Health Trends 1981;13:17-20.
Zeldow PB, 
Preston RC, Daugherty SR. The decision to enter a medical specialty: 
timing and stability. Medical Education 1992;26:327-332.
Yousef K, 
Dema AZ, Zouhair A, Ahmad A,Mohammad K. Factors affecting medical students 
in formulating their specialty preferences in Jordan. BMC Medical Education 
2008;8:32.
Career preferences 
of medical and nursing students in Uttar Pradesh: A Qualitative Analysis. 
HRH technical report - 3. Available at: 
http://www.hrhindia.org/assets/images/Paper-III.pdf. (Accessed on 20th Feb 2011)DNB graduates can teach in Medical 
Colleges. Available at: 
    http://exams.emedicinelive.net/index.php/indian-pg/9-dnb/70-dnb-graduates-can-teach-in-medical-colleges. (Accessed on 15th June  2011).
    Dorsey ER, Jarjoura D, Rutecki GW. The influence of controllable lifestyle and 
sex on the specialty choices of graduating U.S. medical students, 1996–2003. 
Acad Med 2005;80:791-796.
    
Mariolis 
A, Mihas C, Alevizos A, Gizlis V, Mariolis T et al. General Practice 
as a career choice among undergraduate medical students in Greece. BMC 
Medical Education 2007;7:15.
Avgerinos 
ED, Msaouel P, Koussidis GA, Keramaris NC, Bessas Z, Gourgoulianis K. Greek 
medical students' career choices indicate strong tendency towards specialization 
and training abroad. Health Policy 2006;79:101-106.
Egerton 
EA. Career preferences enquiry among Queen's University Medical undergraduates 
and graduates: a follow-up. Medical Education 1983;17:105-111.
McCord JH, McDonald R, Leverson G, Mahvi DM, Rikkers LF, Chen HC et al. Motivation 
to pursue surgical subspecialty training: is there a gender difference? 
J Am Coll Surg 2007;205:698-703.
Kelley J. 
The Effect of Parents’ Politics on their Children’s Education. Worldwide 
Attitudes Vol. 1995-09; 18:1-12. 
Saigal 
P, Takemura Y, Nishiue T, Fetters MD. Factors considered by medical 
students when formulating their specialty preferencesin Japan: findings 
from a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ 2007;11:7-31.
Burack 
JH, Irby DN, Carline JD, Ambrozy DM, Ellsbury KE, Stritter FT. A study 
of medical students' specialty-choice pathways: trying on possible selves. 
Acad Med 1997;72:534-541.
Buddeberg-Fischer 
B, Klaghofer R, Abel T, Buddeberg C. Swiss residents' speciality choices–impact 
of gender, personality traits, career motivation and life goals. BMC 
Health Serv Res 2006;23(6):137.
Ambrozy 
DM, Irby DM, Bowen JL, Burack JH, Carline JD, Stritter FT. Role models' 
perceptions of themselves and their influences on students' specialty 
choices. Acad Med 1997;72:1119-1121.
Henderson 
MC, Hunt DK, Williams JW. General internists influence students to choose 
primary care careers: the power of role modeling. Am J Med 1996;101:648-653.
Ananthakrishnan  
N. Acute shortage of teachers in medical colleges: Existing problems 
and possible solutions. NMJI  2007;20(1):25. |